| |
| 1. | Re: Where are...
Posted by LogicalThinker on 8/22/2002 5:30:20 PM
He never said 15 days, he said until the end o the Summer, and i dont hink he was a fake. And I alos belive he will be back....
- Drew |
| 2. | Re: Where are...
Posted by LogicalThinker on 8/23/2002 2:23:50 PM
Obvouisly yours is different, but i dont understand why. I mean his information was mostly right, for the most part...there was nothing odd about how he spoke, or what he talked about. Or myabe its because he belived tupac is dead, and you oppose his opionion..
- Drew |
| 3. | Re: Where are...
Posted by LogicalThinker on 8/23/2002 5:48:43 PM
Amen:) |
| 4. | Where are...
Posted by LogicalThinker on 8/20/2002 2:42:24 PM
Where are the old people from the old fourm?
and
Where are the good Theroies once posted here?:(
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If tupac is Alive, who belives that he will come back ON Sept 13th 2003?
Personally if he is alive, i belive that he will be back on the 14th, just for dramatic effect...
(TUPAC BLASTING IN THE BACKGROUND: Dear Momma)
|
| 5. | Re: Where are...
Posted by LogicalThinker on 8/20/2002 5:54:22 PM
Well he woudl have to come back after his alleged death...that means to the exact second, or else charges could he filed and then once charges are filed the statue of limitations are not active (so to speak).
I think he will come back on the 14th just to leave people in suspense. And this is if he is alive.
Which i have my doubts about:-/
If he were to come back exactly oin 7 days than he could come back anytime on the 13th after 4:03 (his Time of ... |
| 6. | Re: Where are...
Posted by LogicalThinker on 8/20/2002 6:26:23 PM
Well depends who his true "Enemies" were. If it was the government then i doubt they would persue ANYTHING, mainly because the media would be everywehre, whatching his ever step.
If they were "heartless gangsters" (as he once said) then they are probably dead, and if not, i think they will attempt but fail. Because he will most definatly have a entourage of security detail, ARMED, and what not...
THats my opionion.
|
| 7. | Re: Where are...
Posted by LogicalThinker on 8/21/2002 11:32:37 AM
June 16th of What year?
- Drew |
| 8. | Re: what if makaveli don't showup in 2003
Posted by LogicalThinker on 8/21/2002 1:25:37 AM
I give him a year and a couple months. Until December 2004.
And than i shall let him TIP. And then i start researching, and reviewing the evidence and start hunting down the Son Of a Bitch who killed him.
- Drew |
| 9. | Re: what if makaveli don't showup in 2003
Posted by LogicalThinker on 8/23/2002 5:48:03 PM
Eh. How? Why?
Tough to swallow.
- Drew |
| 10. | Re: what if makaveli don't showup in 2003
Posted by LogicalThinker on 8/23/2002 5:35:25 PM
Ah the police would never ever solve this case, mainly because if Tupac is dead, the government had him killed.
There is a way of getting the evidence into public hands if teh case is nto solved...ask a lawyer. I belive tehre is a way..
- Drew |
| 11. | Re: New Theroy: No Planning (reposted) w/ Additions
Posted by LogicalThinker on 8/23/2002 5:46:51 PM
I think you are wrong, and obvouisly want to belive somthing so much you have bent things, making them appear liek somthing they are not.
Ugh i dont want to fight, but post all the "7 theroies", and i will tell you which ones are bullshit, and which are conicidenses and so fourth.
- Drew |
| 12. | Re: New Theroy: No Planning (reposted) w/ Additions
Posted by LogicalThinker on 8/22/2002 9:21:52 PM
No, 7 years just happens to be how long the Statue of Limitations if for Faking ones death. You are trying to twist my words, and make appear i dont know what i am talking, it is not apperciated. I am not contridicting myself because i dont mention these 7s at all in my theory.
d*mn. If all the "other" theorys are so dependiant on a number than they have already destroyed themselves. And how can you say somthing as blanket as " if all the 7 where coincidences ... |
| 13. | Re: New Theroy: No Planning (reposted) w/ Additions
Posted by LogicalThinker on 8/22/2002 5:28:07 PM
medaphors, other lyrics relate oto 1994, and the 7 are conicdences, and what not, they mean nothing...
- Drew
|
| 14. | Re: New Theroy: No Planning (reposted) w/ Additions
Posted by LogicalThinker on 8/23/2002 2:19:27 PM
Belive what you want, but "7"s are not the base for any kid of a murder theroy.
PLease give examples, and see which ones are conicdences....and which ones are planned.
- Drew |
| 15. | Re: New Theroy: No Planning (reposted) w/ Additions
Posted by LogicalThinker on 8/20/2002 2:26:03 PM
OH its cool. Thanks for clearing that up....:)
True newbie but still they had him in a critical state, even though what you are saying is true, Tupac still could have died.
- Drew |
| 16. | Re: New Theroy: No Planning (reposted) w/ Additions
Posted by LogicalThinker on 8/19/2002 10:55:25 PM
You dont like the theory, or do you. I am confused.
- Drew |
| 17. | New Theroy: No Planning (reposted) w/ Additions
Posted by LogicalThinker on 8/17/2002 1:45:20 PM
This is being reposted from earlier in which i posted it on the old board. SInce i see alot of new names, and new members i decided to repost it with some additions.
-----------------------------
Okay on that night of September 6th Tupac, and Suge they got into the BMW, and yes it was shoot up, everything was real, bullet holes in the car, the surgeries Pac went through, and the wounds he recived. The only thing that was not real is his actuall condition.
|
| 18. | Re: New Theroy: No Planning (reposted) w/ Additions
Posted by LogicalThinker on 8/17/2002 3:46:05 PM
True, but Tupac is also the man who was shot 5 times in 1994, and walked out of the hospital the next day. But he probably had some kind of care, maybe from a "clinic" in which you dont give identification and so forth,
Nah...Suge could not have had him transferred, and he woul dhave to pay them off, and threaten their family's livess....
- Drew |
| 19. | Re: why do they do it???
Posted by LogicalThinker on 8/22/2002 9:22:46 PM
More information about this "3 day theory" would be apperciated.
- Drew |
| 20. | Re: why do they do it???
Posted by LogicalThinker on 8/22/2002 12:10:44 AM
It is possible like hundreds of other people, they too are trying to cash on the death of the "Great One". As sad as that sounds, its possible.
- Drew |
| 21. | Re: why do they do it???
Posted by LogicalThinker on 8/23/2002 5:36:45 PM
Who erased what?
- Drew |
| 22. | Re: why do they do it???
Posted by LogicalThinker on 8/21/2002 6:37:01 PM
hmmm....TOUGH ONE. Maybe they are also Pac is Alive beleivers...I mean they dont say "PAC IS COMMING BACK", they sau "Dont be suprised if he shows up".
Maybe they know a little more than us, considering they work in the business, maybe they here rumors and what not that makes them belive that tupac and yak are really alive.
Just a guess.
- Drew |
| 23. | Re: 2PAC'S NEW ALBUM DELAYED!!!
Posted by LogicalThinker on 8/22/2002 10:54:49 PM
d*mn!, but on another note...remember how Deathrow_employee said it was interscope/tha row production and NO ONE belive him, well some did, everyone was saying "Tha Row" does not have rights anymore....but now thats proof....
just a thought.
- Drew |
| 24. | Re: Tupac-Tha Realest (again...)
Posted by LogicalThinker on 8/22/2002 9:28:27 PM
If you wanna laugh, that is somthing check out.
Tha Realest is NOT new, i mean tupac mentioned him in a couple songs before he died. Also all Tha Realest is a Pac Imposter...his name should be "Tha Bitter", d*mn i have no respect for him, mainly because he is trying to become tupac, and that is in a way, or in my eyes anway, disrespectful.
This site makes little insginficant things into "somthing" for exmaple because he (tha realest) signed ... |
| 25. | Re: Tupac-Tha Realest (again...)
Posted by LogicalThinker on 8/23/2002 2:21:50 PM
Exactly my point, some people wanna BE PAC...like litteraly want to be him, in every way shape or form, and thats wrong.
- Drew |
|
|
|
|
|